This event brought together four leading academic mothers and active advocates for diversity in STEMM to discuss how the various layers of intersectionality can compound the challenges of being an academic mother. Our amazing speakers, Prof Dequina Nicholas, Prof Ariangela Kozik, Prof Rocio Paola Caballero-Gill and Dr Maika Mitchell, addressed the specific obstacles mothers from marginalized communities face in their STEMM career journey and the importance of community and belonging for navigating academia and motherhood. They candidly shared their own journeys, describing the many relatable challenges and biases they encountered both in their personal and professional lives.

One of the central themes that emerged was the lack of structural support and formalized systems to accommodate the unique needs of working mothers, particularly those from marginalized groups. Participants discussed the difficulties they faced in balancing caregiving responsibilities with their academic pursuits, often feeling isolated and unsupported. The COVID-19 pandemic, while disruptive, provided unexpected opportunities for virtual working, allowing some panelists to attend conferences and events they would have otherwise missed due to childcare constraints.

The discussion shed light on the intersectionality of identities and how the compounded effects of marginalization can exacerbate the challenges faced by academic mothers. Factors such as race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and disabilities can create additional barriers and biases, compounding the difficulties associated with balancing parenthood and academic careers. The panelists emphasized the importance of recognizing these intersections and advocating for inclusive solutions that consider individual needs beyond societal assumptions.

Another key issue raised was the need for policy changes and institutional reforms within academia and more broadly in the STEMM sector. Participants advocated for the normalization and integration of parenthood realities into existing policies and programs, such as affordable and accessible childcare options, flexible work arrangements, and supportive mentorship programs. They stressed the importance of addressing cultural assumptions and biases that often hinder the success and well-being of working mothers in these fields.

Throughout the discussion, the panelists shared their personal stories of resilience, perseverance, and triumphs in overcoming systemic barriers. They highlighted the importance of building supportive communities, fostering mentorship opportunities, and advocating for change through collective action. The panelists emphasized the need to be vocal and unapologetic about their identities and experiences while also recognizing the importance of creating safe spaces for open dialogue.

Overall, the "Motherhood at the Intersection" panel discussion shed light on the unique challenges and experiences of academic mothers from marginalized communities in STEMM fields. It highlighted the need for structural changes, inclusive policies, and a holistic understanding of intersectionality to create a more equitable and supportive environment for mothers and caregivers in these fields. The panelists' personal stories and advocacy efforts serve as a powerful call to action for institutions, policymakers, and the broader STEMM community to embrace diversity, promote inclusivity, and support the success of all individuals, regardless of their identities or caregiving responsibilities.

Written by Adaude Amalunweze
28th April 2024